Pin It

Building Green Homes: Step 5 – Building the Shell

In this series on Looking Back & Looking Forward, we are reviewing a green home we built over 2 years ago, the lessons learned and more importantly, how we can (or even how you can) utilize those lessons on future builds. In our last article, we covered the installation from the footings to the sub-flooring being installed. In this article, we are going to cover the wall & roof framing which is also known as the building shell.

The Wall Assembly:

The wall assembly was actually built and based off of “Coastal” best building practices. I know this house is nowhere even close to the coast, but there are a few considerations I needed to account for. First, this structure is being built on a foundation system that is very popular in those areas. Next, while we do not have to worry about hurricanes as they do on the coast, we still have plenty of high wind events that happen around here. Third, while most individuals have an area to go to in event of a tornado, it would be impractical to expect the occupants to be able to make it there safely. Fourth, I am a proponent of being able to “Shelter in Place” which we will discuss in another article.

With that being stated, the walls are constructed of 2 x 6 x 8 studs, with the standard double top plate & single bottom plate for an interior height of 8’ 5”. (Yep, we pulled out every trick to make a small place feel larger and more inviting) The door and window headers consist of doubled up LVL’s and 2 ½” of insulation. For the exterior sheathing, we utilized a product called TallWall that not only increases the strength of the wall, but also saves you money on hangers and blocking. While I like the premise of this product, and what it does deliver, I would have preferred it if I could have actually gotten their WindStorm product which not only has the same benefits, but is a much higher quality panel. Another option that shows a lot of promise, but was not available at the time is the ZipWall system. It is too bad that ZipWall’s parent company does not offer Advantech in larger sizes, and then there would be no contest.

The Roof Assembly:

The roof assembly consists of simple trusses with a 4/12 pitch spaced 16” on center. You may notice 2 items that appear a little odd or off. The first thing you might notice is that the top chord is made up from a 2 x 10, not a standard 2 x 4, which we will cover later in our article on Insulation. The other item that may appear off is the small size of the overhang. There are a few reasons that affected the size of the overhang, first & foremost was the requirement that the house needed to be moved later if required. By keeping the outside dimension at 16’, this allows the house to be moved like a modular home instead of a more costly “Oversize Load.”

The OVE debate:

There is an interesting debate that has been happening in the construction field, and it is between “old-school” techniques and one involving “OVE framing” techniques. If you might recall in our last article, OVE stands for Optimized Value Engineering.  Not to oversimplify the process, but an OVE house, would have all the studs, joists & trusses lined up perfectly above each other on 24” centers. One of their main talking points is how this method uses less lumber & increases the amount of insulation in a wall. In fact, here is a quote from one website about the value of this system;

The more common method of wall framing on 16-inch centers, while structurally sound, uses significantly more lumber and provides less opportunity for insulation. For example, a standard 40-foot wall, 8 feet tall with 2 x 4 stud framing on 16-inch centers will use about 40 studs and leave just under 1,100 square feet of space available for insulation. By comparison, a 40-foot wall built using the OVE stack framing method requires only 25 studs and would create 1,650 square feet of space for insulation.

Reality Check:

Wow, that sounds awesome – I gain all that insulation space by simply going to an OVE system & save on all those lumber costs. Uhhh wait a minute – 8’ tall wall x 40 feet long = 320 SF, where did they get 1100 & 1650 from? Hmmm, maybe it was for a house with four walls, – nope that only equals 1280 SF possible. Wow, it sure looks like someone at HGTV is really engineering some numbers. Realistically, those 15 studs & 1 top plate only gives you an additional 20 SF of insulation out of 320 SF. (55 SF lumber in regular wall 17% / 35 SF of lumber in an OVE wall 11%) The magical cost savings – maybe $45 on material for an additional hour or two’s worth of work getting everything lined up exactly?

A tortoise or an egg:

How many people have seen those small little jade or crystal figurines that run into the thousands? Which item would you rather have protecting it, a tortoise shell or an eggshell? The egg itself is truly a marvelous piece of work using a minimal amount of materials that can safely hold and protect a baby chick until it can hatch 30 days later. A tortoise shell on the other hand is designed to last the occupant for 100’s of years and protect it from almost everything mother nature can throw at it. In some ways, herein is the biggest issue I have with OVE – It is designed just like an egg, it has amazing lines, but it has only been designed / engineered to last 30 years.

A happy medium?

I am glad to say, that there has been numerous changes to the “old school” system actually pioneered by OVE and the first is a 3-stud corner (left side of picture). This eliminates one of the most inefficient corner designs ever and allows insulation to be added in a notoriously leaky area. The second major improvement is the use of a ladder system where an interior wall meets an exterior wall (right side of picture). They also pioneered the idea of insulated headers & I will give them props on utilizing brackets for windowsill plates, even though I used cripple studs in this house.

This entry was posted in Going Green? and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • GreenHome

    Nice article,

    Its nice to see a full analysis of this stage of green home building. Why could you not get a hold of ZipWalls? I have heard good things about them.

    • SLS Construction

      I do not think they had been released yet & even if they were, you should have seen the hoops I had to jump through for the Tallwall. Can you imagine the issues I would have trying to get a just released product.

      As for Zip Wall, assuming you do use it on a project, it is imperitive that you store it properly, tape all seams immediately, and do not let it touch the ground as you will have issues with the edges swelling. The beuty of the system is the actual tape & covering, beyond that, it is just regular OSB

  • Mike Hines

    Nice post, Sean.

    I appreciate how you've assessed the nuances of construction to balance load, shear strength, durability, energy conservation and efficient use of materials. This is precisely why SLS Construction can make claims of providing value for their clients and also demonstrates many improvements supporting sustainable design.

    Thanks for sharing.


  • EnergyVanguard

    Nice article, Sean. I was about to jump all over you about those square footages before I read your 'Reality Check.' I should've known you'd catch something like that, though.

    There's one thing you didn't mention in your last part about the use of 3-stud corners and ladder T-walls – eliminating jack studs by using header hangers. Oh, yeah, speaking of headers, you can eliminate those, too, in any non-load bearing walls. Just put in cripples. Which is the opposite of what I saw in one home under construction in South Carolina. They'd put a big ol' structural header in an interior wall that ran parallel to an in between the ceiling joists above. Now, there's a waste of good wood and effort.

    • SLS Construction

      Thanks Allison, I couldn't believe they actually posted that & yes I have a screen shot if they change it & try to deny it. (Had a lawyer actually pull that one once)

      Header Hangers – Really? I will grant you that they have there uses occasionally, but I would reserve their use for a wall that requires two or more jack studs only. The first reason is structrual – I wouldn't want just one stud supporting the whole load (remember 2 pieces of wood put together is generally regarded as 4 times stronger than 1) The second one is for exterior & interior finishes – you quite simply can not install them properly with just one stud & that can easily lead to water and structrual damage.