<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HomeStar Primer: The Issues &amp; a Fix?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix</link>
	<description>Provided by SLS Construction &#38; Alabama Green Building Solutions of Cullman, AL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: SLS Construction</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>SLS Construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@ChrWright - Homestar articles, Overview = http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac - Issues inc BPI Count by State = http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@ChrWright &#8211; Homestar articles, Overview = <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac</a> &#8211; Issues inc BPI Count by State = <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention HomeStar Primer: The Issues &#38; a Fix? &#124; The Homeowner's Resource Center; provided by SLS Construction of Cullman, AL -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-4124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention HomeStar Primer: The Issues &#38; a Fix? &#124; The Homeowner's Resource Center; provided by SLS Construction of Cullman, AL -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-4124</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SLS Construction. SLS Construction said: @ChrWright - Homestar articles, Overview = http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac - Issues inc BPI Count by State = http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by SLS Construction. SLS Construction said: @ChrWright &#8211; Homestar articles, Overview = <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2akz8ac</a> &#8211; Issues inc BPI Count by State = <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2gycho8</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLS Construction</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-4730</link>
		<dc:creator>SLS Construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-4730</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@TheGreenBuilder - hre we go again, RESNET now has a contrctor prgrm http://tinyurl.com/23weyvd - updated comment http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@TheGreenBuilder &#8211; hre we go again, RESNET now has a contrctor prgrm <a href="http://tinyurl.com/23weyvd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/23weyvd</a> &#8211; updated comment <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>Well, well - it appears that RESNET (they handle the HERS raters), last week announced an 8 hour certification process for contractors. http://resnet.us/main/what_is_a_RESNET_qualified_contractor

Oh this is getting good... I am curious though, how much information they can actually get across in 8 hours, when a weatherization contractor requires 3 full days. I think BPI, and quite a few others will call this a simple feel good money grabbing scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well &#8211; it appears that RESNET (they handle the HERS raters), last week announced an 8 hour certification process for contractors. <a href="http://resnet.us/main/what_is_a_RESNET_qualified_contractor" rel="nofollow">http://resnet.us/main/what_is_a_RESNET_qualified_contractor</a></p>
<p>Oh this is getting good&#8230; I am curious though, how much information they can actually get across in 8 hours, when a weatherization contractor requires 3 full days. I think BPI, and quite a few others will call this a simple feel good money grabbing scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Matson</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Matson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Couldn&#039;t resist.  RT @SLSConstruction: @TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation on HomeStar issues - http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7 #EE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Couldn&#39;t resist.  RT @SLSConstruction: @TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation on HomeStar issues &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7</a> #EE</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLS Construction</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator>SLS Construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-4731</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation on HomeStar issues - http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7 #EE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation on HomeStar issues &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7</a> #EE</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLS Construction</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>SLS Construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-4732</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation - http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@TheGreenBuilder jumps in the conversation &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>Morning Michael, just a few quick points:

First I agree with most of your points but, an Energy Star Contractor is only dealing with “new construction.” As I recall, the third party verifiers they are required to use are only HERS raters. Also to my knowledge, HERS is only a rating program, they don’t have a certified contractor program.

LEED also follows the same lines as Energy Star. They also require a third party verifier, which used to be a HERS or BPI auditor - that has since changed or is in the process of changing as I recall. As for the politics, nobody holds a candle to these guys in this area. 

I am not to sure on the generic test for certifications – I truly think the battle has been fought and won. Do we really want to have 50 different certification tests out there, like is happening in the green rating arena? Besides, Energy Star &amp; LEED, most “green” programs &amp; “state” programs recognize BPI &amp;/or HERS raters and utilize them as consultants &amp; / or verifiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning Michael, just a few quick points:</p>
<p>First I agree with most of your points but, an Energy Star Contractor is only dealing with “new construction.” As I recall, the third party verifiers they are required to use are only HERS raters. Also to my knowledge, HERS is only a rating program, they don’t have a certified contractor program.</p>
<p>LEED also follows the same lines as Energy Star. They also require a third party verifier, which used to be a HERS or BPI auditor &#8211; that has since changed or is in the process of changing as I recall. As for the politics, nobody holds a candle to these guys in this area. </p>
<p>I am not to sure on the generic test for certifications – I truly think the battle has been fought and won. Do we really want to have 50 different certification tests out there, like is happening in the green rating arena? Besides, Energy Star &amp; LEED, most “green” programs &amp; “state” programs recognize BPI &amp;/or HERS raters and utilize them as consultants &amp; / or verifiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>It should also be pointed out that, as an engineer explained to me a few weeks ago, the only reason BPI is required at all is politics. BPI is not the only organization out there with an energy audit and retrofit program and companion auditor/contractor training program. Nor are they even the best or biggest, which is why there are so few trained contractors available. But BPI &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; been the one in Washington lobbying for the bill -- and for their program to be the standard, of course.

In all fairness, HERS, EnergyStar, LEED, and any number of other state programs should also be allowed to participate. I mean, for crine out loud! How far down the rabbit hole do we have to go here before the number of credentials a company and employee has to carry to do the exact same job becomes untenable? Is there really any difference between a &quot;Gold Star BPI Contractor&quot; and a &quot;HERS Building Performance Contractor&quot;? I doubt it. But as written, the HERS Building Performance Contractor would not be able to work on a home seeking rebates under this bill. S/he&#039;d have to pay thousands of dollars to repeat (essentially) the same training, under the BPI name, to work for those customers.

Making the certification and testing requirements generic, so that any certified testing program is qualifies for the rebates, is the only way to end the race for certification dollars. A race that adds costs that end up being passed on to the customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should also be pointed out that, as an engineer explained to me a few weeks ago, the only reason BPI is required at all is politics. BPI is not the only organization out there with an energy audit and retrofit program and companion auditor/contractor training program. Nor are they even the best or biggest, which is why there are so few trained contractors available. But BPI <i>has</i> been the one in Washington lobbying for the bill &#8212; and for their program to be the standard, of course.</p>
<p>In all fairness, HERS, EnergyStar, LEED, and any number of other state programs should also be allowed to participate. I mean, for crine out loud! How far down the rabbit hole do we have to go here before the number of credentials a company and employee has to carry to do the exact same job becomes untenable? Is there really any difference between a &#8220;Gold Star BPI Contractor&#8221; and a &#8220;HERS Building Performance Contractor&#8221;? I doubt it. But as written, the HERS Building Performance Contractor would not be able to work on a home seeking rebates under this bill. S/he&#8217;d have to pay thousands of dollars to repeat (essentially) the same training, under the BPI name, to work for those customers.</p>
<p>Making the certification and testing requirements generic, so that any certified testing program is qualifies for the rebates, is the only way to end the race for certification dollars. A race that adds costs that end up being passed on to the customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/homestar-primer-on-issues-proposed-fix/comment-page-1#comment-3687</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=869#comment-3687</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @SLSConstruction: New post on HRC - 2nd one in the HomeStar Primer series: The Issues &amp; a Possible Fixes? http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @SLSConstruction: New post on HRC &#8211; 2nd one in the HomeStar Primer series: The Issues &amp; a Possible Fixes? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7..." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2ea73l7&#8230;</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

