<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Homeowner&#039;s Resource Center &#187; EPA RRP Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/tag/epa-rrp-rule/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com</link>
	<description>Provided by SLS Construction of Cullman, AL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>140 Day&#8217;s Later: RRP Penalty Guidelines Explained</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines-explainer</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines-explainer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="113" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/epa_leadsafecertfirm-150x113.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="EPA Lead Certified Firm Logo" title="EPA Lead Certified Firm Logo" />In yesterday’s article, we did a quick overview of the RRP’s enforcement policies, looked at the current exemptions, what their 4 levels of enforcement options are, and provided a ton of links to help you hopefully avoid getting into trouble in the first place. In today’s article, we are going to delve a little deeper <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines-explainer">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines-explainer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>139 Days Later: RRP Penalty Guideline&#8217;s Established</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="150" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-fines-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-fines" title="epa-fines" />About a month ago, I was asked to write a 300-word opinion piece on the RRP &#38; where it stood 100 days later. In that piece, I made this comment about enforcement. “Enforcement: Well after being caught in a few lies, the EPA has effectively had its hands tied on the enforcement part. Supposedly, October <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-penalty-guidelines/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA RRP Updates – The Three Stooges &amp; a few other updates</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-updates-the-three-stooges</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-updates-the-three-stooges#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we had previously mentioned and discussed, as of July 6th there is a new Record Keeping Requirement that affects all contractors working on Pre78 Target Housing. Unfortunately, it appears that what the EPA stated it was going to be &#38; what they posted on the E-CFR site is slightly different. Hmmm, they couldn’t possibly <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-updates-the-three-stooges">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-updates-the-three-stooges/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Comment on EPA RRP Proposed Changes</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/public-comment-on-epa-proposal</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/public-comment-on-epa-proposal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRP Countdown & Consequences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />As we have mentioned in some previous posts that the EPA has requested Public Comments on a Proposed Extension into Public, Commercial &#38; Industrial Buildings &#38; a Clearance Testing Proposal. In both of those articles &#38; on numerous forums, we have encouraged others to leave a comment whether they are for or against it. With that in mind, we <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/public-comment-on-epa-proposal">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/public-comment-on-epa-proposal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA RRP: Proposed Extension into Public, Commercial &amp; Industrial Buildings?</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-commercial</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-commercial#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />As we have mentioned in our recent articles on the EPA RRP updates, the EPA is requesting public comments on numerous items. One item they are considering is should they extend the current RRP policies to include public, commercial, and possibly industrial buildings. While this one issue theoretically does not affect Homeowners directly, it can <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-commercial">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-commercial/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA RRP Proposed Changes: Clearance Testing</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-clearance-testing</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-clearance-testing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />Oh boy, here we go again. As a quick history recap &#8211; The following “proposed” &#38; open for “public comment” changes to the RRP are due in part to the Sierra Club settlement that the EPA agreed to back on August 26, 2009. In this settlement, the EPA committed to propose (more like implement) several changes <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-clearance-testing">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-proposed-clearance-testing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA RRP Updates – The New Record Keeping Requirement</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-update-record-keeping-requirement</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-update-record-keeping-requirement#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />*** Update: The reg as stated below was not what they fully published &#8211; new article here *** But hey, who knows they might fix their mistake &#8211; yeah right  As we mentioned in the EPA RRP &#38; HomeStar Updates article back on May 6th, there is a new record keeping regulation that goes into effect <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-update-record-keeping-requirement">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-update-record-keeping-requirement/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RRP Updates: Home Insurance, LSHR, HR 5177, &amp; the Brochures</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-updates-home-insurance-lshr</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-updates-home-insurance-lshr#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goverment Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certified Lead Renovator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Article's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSHR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="96" height="92" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/crcna-membership-logo.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="crcna" title="crcna" /><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1209" title="crcna" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/crcna-membership-logo.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="92" />Well this has been a busy week on many fronts. For most of this week, I have been attending RESNET Training here in Atlanta. Needless to say, the EPA and the fallout from the RRP has not started to dissipate yet. In this article, I have three quick updates, followed by a guest post today from Dean Lovvorn of the Certified Renovator Council of North America’s explaining why many legal “EPA certified” contractors may be working illegally.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/rrp-updates-home-insurance-lshr/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA RRP &amp; HomeStar Updates</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-homestar-updates</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-homestar-updates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goverment Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HomeStar;]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />The RRP’s Opt-Out Provision: As we mentioned in the 10 days later article, the Opt-Out is going bye-bye. The EPA’s proposed changes to remove the Opt-Out provision have been published in the Federal Registrar. In essence, that means any jobs your customers wish to Opt-Out of, will need to be completed within 60 days, aka <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-homestar-updates">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/epa-rrp-homestar-updates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 days later; EPA RRP Updates</title>
		<link>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/10-days-later-epa-rrp-updates</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/10-days-later-epa-rrp-updates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 01:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EPA Lead Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA RRP Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRP Countdown & Consequences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sls-construction.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="127" height="97" src="http://blog.sls-construction.com/wp-content/uploads/epa-certified-firm-sls-construction.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" title="epa-certified-firm-sls-construction" />It has now been 10 full days now since the EPA’s Renovation, Repair &#38; Painting Regulations were put fully in place. According to all of the EPA’s talk, we should have had plenty of news on this subject, but it has ended up being pretty quite overall. With that said, there have been a few <br /><a class="more" href="http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/10-days-later-epa-rrp-updates">Read more ...</a><br />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sls-construction.com/2010/10-days-later-epa-rrp-updates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
